Brown v. Caldwell
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Frederick W. Houser, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to recover from defendants on their joint and several promissory note.
The appeal is from a judgment rendered against both defendants, and is prosecuted upon the judgment-roll alone.
On behalf of appellant Tungate, it is contended that the judgment as to him should be reversed, for the reason that it does not appear that any summons was ever issued or served upon him; nor does the judgment-roll disclose any answer, demurrer or other appearance filed on his part. The judgment, however, recites that defendant Tungate appeared by Watkins & Blodget, as attorneys for himself and his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re Estate of EichhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Drake v. DuvenickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. MatthaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Lyons v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Flores v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Santerre v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
- Shank v. BlackburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Coats & Williamson, Inc. v. Moran & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924