Legal Opinion

Finance Co. v. . Hendry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, a corporation, sued the defendant, an individual, trading under the style of "Baltimore Mercantile Company," on six promissory notes. These notes are payable to Brenard Manufacturing Company, and plaintiff sues as holder in due course. In each note is the stipulation: "In case of default in payment I agree to pay payee's reasonable attorney fees."

The defendant admits the execution and delivery of these notes to the payee, but denies that plaintiff is a holder in due course. The defendant further says the notes were procured by fraud and deceit of the payee, and that the goods…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Simon v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Bank of Commerce v. FuquaMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. O'Neill v. Thomas Day Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Myer v. HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stillwell Enterprises, Inc. v. Interstate Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Colbert v. Ashland Construction Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. SchreyerOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Patterson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API