Legal Opinion

Meeks v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1928No. 17602PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MASON, V. C. J.

The plaintiffs in error, Christine Meeks and Henry Meeks, her husband, and Linda Bishop and Sim Bishop, her husband, commenced this action against the defendants in error, the Oklahoma National Bank of Skiatook, A. W. Lucas, L. L. Wiles, Alice M. O’Brien, and Alice M. O’Brien, as executrix of the estate of L. A. O’Brien, deceased, for the purpose of canceling a certain mortgage and certain deeds which they had executed covering lands, described in the petition, located in Tulsa county.

After the issues were joined and the case called for trial and a jury impaneled and sworn to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mires v. HoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Stonebraker-Zea Cattle Co. v. HiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Sullivan v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Weeks v. Garibaldi South Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Collinsville Nat. Bank v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Progress Brewing Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Sautbine v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  3. Adams v. DanielsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Kelley v. Lowder's Heirs, Etc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  5. McIntosh v. v. & L. Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API