Legal Opinion

Savings & Loan Society v. McKoon

California Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1898No. L. A. 398PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts arc stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BELCHER, C.

The plaintiff is a corporation duly organized under the laws of this state for the purpose of transacting the business of a savings bank, and having its principal place of business in the city and county of San Francisco. It brought this action in the superior court of San Diego county to foreclose a mortgage upon lands in that county, given by defendant’s testator to secure payment of his promissory note. Both the note and mortgage were executed in San Francisco, and the note was made payable at the office of plaintiff. The complaint follows the usual form in such cases and states…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Williams v. Santa Clara Mining Ass'n of Balt.California Supreme Court · 1884
  3. California Savings & Loan Society v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Fogarty v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Johnson v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Moss v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Domarad v. Fisher & Burke, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Anglo-Californian Bank, Ltd. v. FieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Drewry v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. One 1941 Cadillac Club CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API