Legal Opinion
Fleeger v. Wyeth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 3, 2009No. A08-2124PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAGNUSON, Chief Justice.
Plaintiff Rachel Fleeger, a resident of Pennsylvania, took hormone medication manufactured by defendants Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Wyeth) and Greenstone, Ltd. Neither defendant is a Minnesota resident; however, both defendants admit that Minnesota courts have general personal jurisdiction over them. Fleeger filed her lawsuit in the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, and the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) transferred the case to the United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas (the MDL court). Pursuant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Dalton v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Myers v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Oanes v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sanchez v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. Castillo-AlvarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Rick v. Wyeth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- James Ariola, as next of kin of, and trustee for, the Estate of Jack Ariola Erenberg, his son, and the Class of Beneficiaries, Pursuant to Minn. Stat. 573.02 v. The City of Stillwater, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Powell v. I-Flow Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.