Legal Opinion
State v. Castillo-Alvarez
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 11, 2013No. Nos. A11-1379, A12-0081PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
Appellant Juan Humberto Castillo-Alvarez challenges his convictions for second-degree murder and kidnapping, in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.19, subds. 1(1), 2(1), 609.25 (2012). Castillo-Alvarez contends that Minn.Stat. § 609.045 (2012) and the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Minnesota Constitution bar the prosecution in this case. He also asserts that the district court erred in admitting evidence of his unrecorded statement to law enforcement. Because neither section 609.045 nor the Minnesota Constitution bar the prosecution and because the district court…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heath v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Gutierrez v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. BergstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Gretsch v. Vantium Capital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Kristi Dannette McneillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.