Legal Opinion
Sanchez v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 18, 2012No. A09-2195PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
Jorge Sanchez was convicted, after a stipulated facts bench trial, of first-degree possession of a controlled substance. More than 5 years after his conviction became final, Sanchez filed this petition for postconviction relief. The postconviction court denied Sanchez’s petition as untimely and meritless. The court of appeals affirmed. Sanchez v. State, No. A09-2195, 2010 WL 2818535, at *3-4 (Minn.App. July 20, 2010).1 Because we conclude that Sanchez’s petition was untimely, we affirm.
In August 2002, Sanchez was arrested while in possession of over 25 grams of…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. James Marcello and Anthony ZizzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Artis Whitehead v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Daniel Rassier v. John SannerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Jacob Stephen Brown v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- Erickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Second Chance Investments, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.