Legal Opinion
State v. Wells
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 15, 2002No. C4-01-971PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
The district court dismissed charges against Leonard Wells for racketeering and controlled-substance crimes because Wells was not brought to trial within 180 days of his request for final disposition under the Interstate Agreement on De- tainers (IAD). In this pretrial appeal, the state argues that Wells waived the 180-day requirement by acquiescing to pretrial proceedings inconsistent with the IAD time limitations. On the undisputed facts the state has established waiver, and we reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
The state filed racketeering and controlled-substance…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- League to Save Lake Tahoe v. B.J.K. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- State v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Walker v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
- State v. VONBEHRENCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. KurzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Clifford Allen Smith v. Brad Livingston, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.