Legal Opinion
State v. Burks
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 17, 2001No. C0-00-1671PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSON, Judge
On appeal from a conviction of felon in possession of a pistol, appellant argues that he substantially complied with the Interstate Agreement on Detainers by demanding final disposition of the Minnesota complaint in a 1997 request to Wisconsin authorities, even though Wisconsin authorities neglected to forward his request for final disposition to Minnesota authorities. He contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charge, which was not brought to trial until 2000. We affirm.
FACTS
On February 12, 1997, appellant Denar-ro Tyrone Burks was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Mary M. MARES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. PeroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Commonwealth v. CopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Resendiz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.