Fex v. Michigan
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
This case arises out of a “detainer,” which is a request filed by a criminal justice agency with the institution in which a prisoner is incarcerated, asking that the prisoner be held for the agency, or that the agency be advised when the prisoner’s release is imminent. Indiana and Michigan, along with 46 other States, the District of Columbia, and the United States, are parties to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD). See Ind. Code §35-33-10-4 (1988); Mich. Comp. Laws §780.601 (1979); Pub. L. 91-538, 84 Stat. 1397-1403, 18 U.S.C. App. §2; 11 U. L. A. 213-214 (Supp. 1992) (listing *45jurisd…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- State v. LippolisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Dennett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Hoss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by251 opinions
- Reed v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- New York v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Foster v. LudwickDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- William Longenette v. Peter Krusing William E. Perry, Special Agent Fbi Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
246 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.