Legal Opinion

State v. Kurz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 17, 2004No. A03-1747PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the charges against him on the ground that, under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act, the time to prosecute him had expired and the court no longer had jurisdiction. Because the six-month period for prosecution under the Act was tolled by appellant’s earlier motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause, we affirm.

FACTS

On May 30, 2002, appellant Kevin Kurz was arrested in Mower County for fleeing a police officer, felony theft, and assisting a theft. On June 6, 2002, appellant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  2. State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  4. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  5. In Re the Welfare of V.D.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. VONBEHRENCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Resendiz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State v. RoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API