New York v. Hill
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
This case presents the question whether defense counsel’s agreement to a trial date outside the time period required by Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers bars the defendant from seeking dismissal because trial did not occur within that period.
I
The Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) is a compact entered into by 48 States, the United States, and the District of Columbia to establish procedures for resolution of one State’s outstanding charges against a prisoner of another State. See N. Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 580.20 (McKinney 1995); 18 U. S. C. App. § 2; 11A U. L. A. 48…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by502 opinions
- Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- McCoy v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- People v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
497 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.