Legal Opinion

New York v. Hill

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 2000No. 98-1299PublishedCited by 502 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

This case presents the question whether defense counsel’s agreement to a trial date outside the time period required by Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers bars the defendant from seeking dismissal because trial did not occur within that period.

I

The Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) is a compact entered into by 48 States, the United States, and the District of Columbia to establish procedures for resolution of one State’s outstanding charges against a prisoner of another State. See N. Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 580.20 (McKinney 1995); 18 U. S. C. App. § 2; 11A U. L. A. 48…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by502 opinions

  1. Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. McCoy v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Zedner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. People v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 2000

497 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API