Legal Opinion

State v. VONBEHREN

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 2010No. A08-1347PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BJORKMAN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss this felony tax-evasion case based on the UMDDA. Because we hold that the UMDDA does not apply to persons who have been released from physical custody and that appellant waived his rights under the UMD-DA through his conduct, we affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Thomas Vonbehren was the subject of a lengthy investigation of his failure to file Minnesota tax returns for several years. On February 16, 2005, appellant was charged in an 11-count indictment with various tax-related offenses. Three days later,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. People v. HiginbothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. People v. ShreckColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. FribergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. YzetaNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  2. Resendiz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. McClearyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  5. State v. McClearyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API