Legal Opinion

Fenwick v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 11, 2008No. 3:06cv880 (WWE)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

WARREN W. EGINTON, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs William Fenwick and Timothy Fisher bring this action on behalf of themselves and all similarly situated adult participants and/or beneficiaries of the Ad-vest, Inc. Account Executive Nonqualified Defined Benefit Plan (“AE Plan”) who have been or will be denied benefits under the AE Plan because they terminated their employment at Advest.

Specifically, plaintiffs assert that defendants breached the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) because…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  2. England v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  3. Bond v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API