Legal Opinion
Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension Plan
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 3, 2009No. Case 08-cv-3682PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT M. DOW, JR., District Judge.
Plaintiff, Omar Hakim (“Hakim”), filed a putative class action complaint [1] on June 27, 2008 on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq. (“ERISA”), against Accenture United States Pension Plan and Accenture LLP. Subsequently, on September 2, 2008, Plaintiff filed a first amended class action complaint [29] adding additional defendants. The first amended complaint asserts five counts under ERISA against Accenture United States Pension…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Gibson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Carlson v. Northrop Grumman Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Schultz v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Hakim v. Accenture United States Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
- Hartman v. Dana Holding Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
- Hutcherson v. Krispy Kreme Doughnut Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.