Legal Opinion
Fox v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1963No. 36518PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
In this action, the plaintiffs sought recovery of certain medical, surgical, and hospital expenses under the terms of insurance policies issued to them by the defendant. Their suit was resisted on the grounds that the insurance policies had been obtained through false representations and that the policies had been rescinded by agreement of the parties.
The jury found in favor of the plaintiffs on the first ground, and the court ruled that there had been no rescission. Judgment for the plaintiffs was entered accordingly.
On appeal, the defendant has set forth a number of assignments of error,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. BackstromWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Eaton v. National Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Granville v. American Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Lesicich v. North River Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by18 opinions
- Levy v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Johnson International Co. v. Jackson National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Schwab v. Washington State Bar Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Van Noy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Marine v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.