Legal Opinion
Pitner v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 27, 1971No. 10832PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
In the summer of 1968, plaintiff-appellant Lyle G. Pitner planted barley on certain acreage in Kootenai County, Idaho, and thus there was no summer fallow of this land. A substantial portion of this barley crop was lost before harvest. Pitner then planted winter wheat on the same land. The wheat crop was also almost completely destroyed by winterkill. As a result of this loss of the wheat crop, Pitner commenced this suit to recover insurance benefits under a policy issued by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (hereinafter referred to as FCIC).
The facts developed at…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Mary L. Brandt and Natalie Z. Shell v. Walter J. Hickel, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Douglas McKay Secretary of the Interior v. L. C. WahlenmaierCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Bratton v. SliningerIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Lazy Fc RanchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Resource Engineering, Inc. v. SilerIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Lowe v. LymIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Northeast Insurance v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.