Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Security State Bank v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 16, 1921No. 22,574PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Upon the relation of Security State Bank of Waldorf the supreme court granted its alternative writ of mandamus directed to Honorable Arthur R. Childress, judge of Waseca county, directing him to retain for trial the above entitled action brought- in that county.

1Opinion of the Court

Per, Curiam.

Alternative writ of mandamus to the judge of the district court of Waseca county directing him to retain for trial an action brought in that county.

1. There was a garnishment proceeding in which the Farmers State Bank of Pemberton had intervened and applied for and obtained an order changing the venue to Blue Earth county. The order was made on *499the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice would be promoted by the change, and was based on an affidavit stating that the only issue to be tried was one between the plaintiff-relator and the Pemberton bank, that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  3. Wilson v. RichardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  4. Wildner v. FergusonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Delasca v. GrimesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cook v. TrovattenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  2. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Gilloley v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Castle v. Village of BaudetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Swanson v. AlworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API