Legal Opinion

Gilloley v. Sampson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1938No. 31,623PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

This action was here before in Shandorf v. Sampson, 198 Minn. 92, 268 N. W. 841, where the facts are fully stated. Plaintiff bank recovered a judgment against the defendant, Sampson, on a promissory note, which it is seeking to collect by garnishment proceedings against the S. & S. Contracting Company, a subcontractor by whom Sampson was employed, the Erickson-Johnson Construction Company and ft. B. Fraser Construction Company, the principal contractors with the state of Minnesota, Seaboard Surety Company, surety on their bond as such contractors, and the Standard Surety &…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Minnesota & Ontario Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co. v. BartschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  3. Buttrick Lumber Co. v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. McConnell v. PoorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Knudson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Buysse v. Baumann-Furrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Ylijarvi v. BrockphalerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Gudbrandsen v. PeltoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API