Legal Opinion

Swanson v. Alworth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1924No. 24,024PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Original proceeding in mandamus whereby it is sought to have the district court of St. Louis county peremptorily ordered to grant plaintiff a jury trial.

The complaint states either a cause of action at law for damages for breach of contract, or in equity for an accounting for the profits of an executed contract in the nature of a joint enterprise. The former is plaintiff’s view. If it is correct, there should be a jury trial. The latter, the defendants’ construction, was adopted below. It resulted in an order setting the case for trial without a jury. It is now sought to review and reverse…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Prall v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. State ex rel. Early v. WunderlichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Casmey v. TealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. State ex rel. Security State Bank v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Klimek v. School District No. 70Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. McLean Distributing Co. v. Brewery & Beverage Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Local No. 993Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Swanson v. AlworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Gresham v. DelaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Waters v. PutnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API