Wildner v. Ferguson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
The Lillibridge Bremner Co. was summoned as garnishee of the defendant, Ferguson, in the municipal court of Minneapolis, and disclosed an indebtedness of $56.25. The court, on the disclosure, allowed defendant an exemption of $20, and rendered judgment for $36.25 against the garnishee, from which the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGileiluan, C. J.
This is a proceeding in garnishment, the debtor defendant appealing from the judgment of the court below against the garnishee defendant. The point made by appellant is that the debt reached by the garnishment, being for wages due the appellant, was exempt, under Gen. St. 1878, c. 66, § 310, subdiv. 11, as amended by Laws 1879, c. 5. After the court below had filed its decision, directing judgment for the plaintiff, the appellant requested it to find whether, at the times covered by the garnishment, the appellant was a laboring man, within the meaning of subdivision 11, and thereupon the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wakefield v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Aikin v. . WassonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Coffin v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Ericsson v. BrownNew York Supreme Court · 1862
- Brusie v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Olsen v. Board of Control of State InstitutionsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Fletcher v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Paddock v. BalgordSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Gilloley v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- State ex rel. Security State Bank v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.