Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 31, 1940No. Civ. 6218PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This action was brought by respondent to enjoin appellants from proceeding in any manner to enforce the installation of a fish screen without first paying respondent one-half of the estimated cost thereof. A decree was entered granting the injunction, and defendants have appealed.

The respondent is a private domestic corporation engaged in producing, generating, transmitting, delivering, or furnishing electricity for light, heat or power. For this purpose it owns a reservoir known as Fuller Lake used for the temporary storage of waters which are thereafter released into a canal or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. In Re SumidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. People v. Keith Railway Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Ferrante v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Ferrante v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Perez v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API