Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action was brought by respondent to enjoin appellants from proceeding in any manner to enforce the installation of a fish screen without first paying respondent one-half of the estimated cost thereof. A decree was entered granting the injunction, and defendants have appealed.
The respondent is a private domestic corporation engaged in producing, generating, transmitting, delivering, or furnishing electricity for light, heat or power. For this purpose it owns a reservoir known as Fuller Lake used for the temporary storage of waters which are thereafter released into a canal or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In Re SumidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Rainey v. MichelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- People v. Keith Railway Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Ferrante v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Ferrante v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Perez v. SharpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.