Legal Opinion

Martin v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1924No. S. F. No. 11128. Crim. No. 2683. S. F. No. 11339PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

The three above-entitled eases, although differing in the facts which form the basis of the respective petitions, present precisely the same legal questions for decision. Each petition attacks the legality of the procedure provided for the selection and listing of trial jurors in certain counties of the state of which the county of Sacramento is one.

In the matter of the application of Fred W. Chapman, the petitioner seeks his release upon habeas corpus from a judgment adjudging him guilty of contempt of court in refusing to answer a summons to appear and serve as a trial juror and in refusing…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Bacon v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. In Re HerreraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Armenta v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API