Perez v. Sharp
California Supreme Court
1DissentShenk, J.
I dissent.
The power of a state to regulate and control the basic social relationship of marriage of its domiciliaries is here challenged and set at nought by a majority order of this court arrived at not by a concurrence of reasons but by the end result of four votes supported by divergent concepts not supported by authority and in fact contrary to the decisions in this state and elsewhere.
It will be shown that such laws have been in effect in this country since before our national independence and in this state since our first legislative session. They have never been declared…
2Cases cited80 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.