Rainey v. Michel
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The defendant; Herman Michel, appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $75,550, rendered in an action brought by the Superintendent of Banks in an attempt to enforce a stockholder’s liability under the Bank Stockholders Liability Act. (Stats. 1931, p. 338.)
The Marine Bank of Santa Monica was organized under the banking laws of this state. Its shares of capital stock were of the par value of $100 each, with 1166 shares outstanding. The defendant owned 780% of these shares on August 14, 1931.
The bank became insolvent and the plaintiff, in the exercise of his statutory powers as…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Kennedy v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Bernheimer v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- In Re ChetwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. Western Fruit GrowersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Bliss v. DorityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.