Legal Opinion
Ferrante v. Fish & Game Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1946No. S. F. 17331; S. F. 17332; S. F. 17333; S. F. 17334; S. F. 17335; S. F. 17356Published
1Opinion of the Court
29 Cal.2d 365 (1946)
S. A. FERRANTE, etc., et al., Petitioners,
v.
THE FISH & GAME COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.
S. F. No. 17331.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Dec. 6, 1946.
Wm. P. Hornblower, Fabian D. Brown and Jefferson E. Peyser for Petitioners.
Hudson, Martin, Ferrante & Street, and Russell Zaches, as Amici Curiae, on Behalf of Petitioners.
Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, and Ralph W. Scott, Deputy Attorney General, for Respondent.
Burnham Enersen, McCutchen, Thomas, Matthew, Griffiths & Greene, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, Eugene M. Prince, Eugene D. Bennett,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.