Legal Opinion

Stockton Savings Bank v. McCown

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1915No. Sac. No. 2177PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the order denying its motion for a new trial.

The suit was based upon a rejected claim against the estate of Sidney Newell deceased and the only question necessary for decision is whether or not the court erred in holding that the claim, as presented, was fatally defective. The record discloses the following state of facts: In 1902 S. W. Newell was indebted to Stockton Savings Bank in a large sum of money. A settlement was made resulting in the giving of a note by him to that corporation. No part of the debt was an obligation of his father, Sidney…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In re Estate of SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Adams v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Chase v. EvoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Richards v. Travelers' InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Flynn v. DriscollIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Thompson v. KoellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State Ex Rel. Paramount Publix Corp. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Burnett v. NeraalMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Harwood v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API