Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Swain

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1885No. 9705PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from an order and decree of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco settling and allowing the final account of an administrator, and directing the payment of certain claims. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.

In this proceeding the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, sitting as a court of probate, upon the settlement of the final account of the administrator of the estate of R. B. Swain, deceased, decreed the allowance and partial payment of certain claims against the estate, which having been allowed by the administrator and approved by the *638probate judge, were duly filed. The claims thus allowed and ordered paid amounted to $60,000. Three of them were contested at the final settlement. The first of these claims is as follows:—

1. “Estate of E. B. Swain, deceased, 1871, to John…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of CrosbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. In re Estate of SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  3. In re the Estate of LosheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Verdier v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Furman v. CraineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. More v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API