Richards v. Travelers' Insurance
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Nevada County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action on a policy of life insurance. There was a demurrer to the complaint, on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled; the defendant answered, denying the material allegations of the complaint, and setting up some affirmative matters. There was a trial by jury, verdict for the plaintiffs, and judgment accordingly. The defendant appeals on the judgment roll.
The only point made in this court is, that the demurrer to the complaint was improperly overruled, for the reason that there-was no allegation in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Barron v. FrinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Morgan v. MenziesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Du Brutz v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by19 opinions
- Arnold v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Kimball v. Richardson Kimball Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Greninger v. FischerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Merchants' & Bankers' Fire Underwriters v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Miller v. Pine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.