Burnett v. Neraal
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.
While tbe estate of Glen Bisard, deceased, was in process of administration, Mary F. Burnett presented to tbe defendant, Paul 0. Neraal, as administrator of tbe estate, a duly verified claim for money alleged to be due her on an open account and also upon a promissory note. No question is made concerning tbe sufficiency of tbe claim upon tbe account. Neither tbe original nor a copy of tbe note was attached to or accompanied tbe claim as presented to tbe administrator.
In passing, we observe that tbe claim does not advise who made tbe note nor to whom it was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Vanderpool v. VanderpoolMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Evans v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Waltemar v. Schnick's EstateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Stockton Savings Bank v. McCownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
3Cited by6 opinions
- Flynn v. DriscollIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Paramount Publix Corp. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Steinfort v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1939
- Cocanougher v. CocanougherMontana Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Montana Flour Mills Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.