Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Koeller

California Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1920No. L. A. No. 5371PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

This is an appeal by the two principal defendants from a judgment against them foreclosing a mortgage upon real property given to secure'a note for two thousand dollars. The facts are:

The note and mortgage were executed by the defendant, Frederick Koeller, and his wife, Louise Koeller, the latter of whom subsequently died and the administrator of whose es-state, Walter H. Richards, is the other of the appealing defendants. The note and mortgage by their terms denote an absolute obligation to pay on the part of the Koellers, but were in fact given as collateral security for the payment of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pollitz v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Western States Life Ins. Co. v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Naftzger v. GreggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Neel v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Satterfield v. GarmireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Warder v. HutchisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API