Legal Opinion

People v. Duong

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 2010No. A124640PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POLLAK, J.

The district attorney of San Francisco appeals from an order fixing the amount of restitution that defendant Tuan Quong Duong is obligated to pay to the victim of his assault. The victim received medical treatment at Kaiser Hospital, a facility within the Kaiser California North Health Plan (Kaiser), of which the victim was a member. The trial court refused to require restitution of the amount “billed” for the victim’s treatment because as a member of Kaiser the victim was not liable to pay any additional amount for those services. Defendant has filed no opposing brief in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. MillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. HoveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. People v. Anthony M.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. K.F.California Court of Appeal · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BrunetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. Brooks, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. Eric S.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. HumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. In re Ronald F. CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API