Legal Opinion
People v. Anthony M.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 2007No. C053576PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BLEASE, Acting P. J.
This case raises the question whether victim restitution for medical expenses under Welfare and Institutions Code section 730.6 1 is based upon the amount charged by the medical provider or the amount actually paid by Medi-Cal when the provider is precluded from seeking the unpaid balance from the victim.
The juvenile court ordered the minor to pay $1,056,600.90 in victim restitution for medical expenses after he admitted he shot his friend in the head while playing with a loaded gun. The juvenile court determined the amount of the medical expenses based upon the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Sacramento v. DrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. MillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. ChappeloneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. K.F.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. TabbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.