Legal Opinion

People v. K.F.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 2009No. H032977PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

Appellant K.F. was directed to pay restitution after being adjudged a person described in section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. On appeal he contends that the restitution order was erroneous in several respects. We sustain some of his objections and reject others. We will therefore affirm the order with modifications.

Background

The juvenile court sustained a petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 alleging that appellant committed assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury and producing great bodily injury (Pen. Code, §§…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Olszewski v. Scripps HealthCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Jasmine Networks, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. DuongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. People v. Eric S.California Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. People v. Anthony S.California Court of Appeal · 2014

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API