Legal Opinion

People v. Brunette

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 2011No. H035370PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUFFY, J.

A jury convicted Robert Christopher Brunette, the defendant herein, of animal cruelty and neglect. The trial court ordered him to pay a large restitution amount to the animal welfare agency that had to arrange care for the dogs it rescued. This appeal requires us to consider whether the trial court erred in not reducing the award to account for the agency’s putative comparative negligence in not abating the condition sooner, and abused its discretion by not setting off revenues the agency may have received from adopting out some of the dogs.

We will affirm the judgment except…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. GamacheCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. GiordanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. P. v. Petronella CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Ash v. North American Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Ash v. North American Title Co.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. Adams CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API