Legal Opinion
People v. Hume
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 21, 2011No. A128757PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, Acting P. J.
Convicted of embezzlement by an employee with an excess taking clause allegation (Pen. Code,1 §§ 487, subd. (a), 506, 12022.6, subd. (a)), appellant and former licensed attorney Edward Duff Hume was ordered to pay victim restitution to several persons, including two who had received some reimbursement from the California State Bar’s Client Security Fund (CSF). Appellant challenges that aspect of the restitution order, urging that the trial court should have reduced the amount of restitution to those victims by the amount each received from the CSF. He offers…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. MillardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. BernalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Saleeby v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Harris v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Kassas v. The State Bar of CaliforniaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Kassas v. The State Bar of CaliforniaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2021
- People v. Hernandez CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2016