Legal Opinion

Mendelsohn v. Mendelsohn

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 8, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for partition brought by a husband against his wife, in which the complainant seeks to charge against his wife's interest the expenditures made by him in improving the property in question.

In April, 1916, about a year after the marriage of the parties, the property in question, 146 Broadway, Paterson, New Jersey, was conveyed to complainant and defendant jointly, with the result that they became tenants by the entirety. The parties resided in the house on the premises until the spring of 1922, when complainant purchased a home on East Thirty-sixth street. In October, 1924,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGee v. McGeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Rosecrans v. RosecransNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. O'Keefe v. O'KeefeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  4. Ringold v. RingoldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Walnut Valley State Bank v. StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Gimbel v. VeninoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  3. Norcross v. 1016 Fifth Avenue Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
  4. Zanzonico v. ZanzonicoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  5. Hall v. HallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API