Legal Opinion

Gimbel v. Venino

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 1, 1944No. Docket 143/134PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Four bonds and mortgages were executed by Edward Meyer to Maria Dietzsch and Albin Dietzsch, husband and wife, two of which mortgages covered 209-211 40th Street in Union City and the other two covered 132-134 40th Street in said city. The interests of the husband and wife in the bonds and mortgages were as tenants in common. Flemming v. Iuliano, 92 N.J. Eq. 685; Central TrustCo. v. Street, 95 N.J. Eq. 278; Franklin National Bank v.Freile, 116 N.J. Eq. 278, 283; affirmed, 117 N.J. Eq. 405. By mesne conveyances from Meyer, title to the two mortgaged premises became vested in Senior Investment…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Franklin Nat. Bank v. FreileNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
  2. Franklin Nat. Bank, Jersey City v. FreileSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Black v. BlackNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1878
  4. Selover v. SeloverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  5. Young v. YoungNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1889

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anthony L. Petters Diner, Inc. v. StellakisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. In Re Lea Fabrics, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
  3. Barry, Inc. v. Baf, LimitedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  4. Farmers Cooperative Exchange, Inc. v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Colquhoun (Eliz.) Est. v. Colquhoun (Robt.) Est.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API