Legal Opinion

Hall v. Hall

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 4, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 N.J. Super. 97 (1951)

78 A.2d 92

HELEN HALL, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

SIDNEY HALL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND ROOSEVELT PARK, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued December 11, 1950.

Decided January 4, 1951.

Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.

Mr. William J. Reimer argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Mr. H. Edward Neese, attorney).

Mr. A. Nathan Cowen argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. George L. Lombardi, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, S.J.A.D.

The issue here…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wm. Eckelmann, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. McGee v. McGeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  3. Strong v. StrongSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  4. Strong v. StrongNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
  5. Nobile v. BartlettaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yeck v. RietzkeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Rayher v. RayherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API