Legal Opinion

Rosecrans v. Rosecrans

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 11, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The complainant and defendant are husband and wife, living in Atlantic City, New Jersey.

The testimony indicates the defendant to be well versed in the hotel business; that while he is able to operate a hotel in an apparently successful manner, he had not, prior to the present venture, been able to conduct his business in a manner to show financial success.

The wife is an active and energetic woman with the ability to save money, and appears to have considerable financial standing.

They first became associated after he had failed in the conduct of the Hotel Lexington, in Atlantic City, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGee v. McGeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  2. Buttlar v. RosenblathSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1887
  3. Hood v. HoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Walnut Valley State Bank v. StovallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  2. Witzel v. WitzelWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. TURRO EX REL. TURRO v. TurroNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Mendelsohn v. MendelsohnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  5. Norcross v. 1016 Fifth Avenue Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API