Legal Opinion

O'Keefe v. O'Keefe

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 20, 1924PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The controversy is purely one of equity pleadings, subject, especially, to the recent statutes relating to the court of chancery and rules of that court. P. L. 1915 p. 184; for the rules, see 100 Atl. Rep. 7.

The first point made on the appeal is that paragraph 2 of the answer was improperly stricken. It reads as follows: “Paragraph 2 is denied, except that defendant admits that the rents received from the eight bungalows in 1921 amounted to $3,320, and for 1922 to $3,410; and that complainant received the rents for 1923 amounting to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hiles v. . FisherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Ringold v. RingoldNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  3. Diamond Cork Co. v. Maine Jobbing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alcaro v. Jean Jordeau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. Mendelsohn v. MendelsohnNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
  3. Zanzonico v. ZanzonicoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  4. Alcaro v. Jean Jordeau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API