Legal Opinion
Schick v. Windsor Airmotive Division/Barnes Group
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 6, 1993No. 12219PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.
The dispositive issue of this motion to dismiss by the plaintiff in a workers’ compensation case is whether a decision of the workers’ compensation review board, remanding a case to the workers’ compensation commissioner for a hearing de novo, is a final judgment. The defendants oppose the motion, claiming that the remand order is an appealable final judgment. We conclude that the remand order is a final judgment and that, therefore, the appeal should not be dismissed.
The procedural history is undisputed. In 1987, the plaintiff filed a workers’ compensation claim, after suffering a myocardial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Solomon v. KeiserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Conetta v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Cantoni v. Xerox Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Smith v. Otis Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Dacey v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Akerson v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.