Legal Opinion
Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 26, 1991No. 14015PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.
The defendants appeal the decision of the Appellate Court affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation review division (review division) which affirmed the decision of the workers’ compensation commissioner for the second district (commissioner) granting the plaintiff’s motion to preclude. We affirm.
Although the facts are set forth in the decision of the Appellate Court; Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc., 21 Conn. App. 610, 575 A.2d 257 (1990); we discuss those facts pertinent to the issues. On March 11,1986, the plaintiff, Joseph Cleveland, a resident of New Jersey employed as a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Gurliacci v. MayerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Parsons v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.