Legal Opinion
Akerson v. City of Bridgeport
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 8, 1994No. 13761PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss the defendant’s appeal for lack of a final judgment. Because the appeal was taken from the denial of a motion to dismiss the action, we conclude that no final judgment exists and that the appeal must be dismissed.
*159The procedural history of this case is not in dispute. The plaintiff brought this personal injury action against the defendant pursuant to General Statutes § 13a-149 for injuries he sustained when he slipped and fell on a sidewalk. The trial court granted the plaintiff s motion for default based on the defendant’s failure to plead. Before a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Cannavo Enterprises, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. MalkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Sasso v. AleshinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Arrow Concrete Co. v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Annecharico v. PattersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- C & P Excavating Contractors, Inc. v. Ardmare Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Melfi v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.