Legal Opinion
Dacey v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 9, 1996No. 13703PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeiman, J.
The defendants1 appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court remanding the case to the commission on human rights and opportunities (commission) for further proceedings. The defendants claim that the court improperly substituted its factual findings for those of the commission. Because we conclude that there is no final judgment in this case, we dismiss the defendants’ appeal.
The record discloses the following relevant facts and procedural history. On April 26, 1982, the plaintiff, age thirty-six, applied for a job as a police officer with the Naugatuck police department. After she…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Watson v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. LemoineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Lisee v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Children's School, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pizza Connection, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Latina v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.