Legal Opinion

Smith v. Otis Elevator Co.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 23, 1993No. 12802PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s appeal for lack of a final judgment. The dispositive issue before us is whether a final judgment exists after the trial court has denied a motion to set aside the verdict but before it has heard evidence of collateral source payments pursuant to General Statutes § 52-225a.1 We conclude that final judgment does not enter until after the collateral source payment issue has been decided and, therefore, the appeal must be dismissed for lack of a final judgment.

The procedural history of this case is not in dispute. In 1990, the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  5. Rhodes v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Akerson v. City of BridgeportConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Tucker v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
  4. Ng v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Annecharico v. PattersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API