Legal Opinion

guardianship/conservatorship of Van Sickle

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2005No. 20040195, 20040224PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] David Van Sickle appealed from a July 30, 2003, order appointing a guardian and conservator for his father, Bruce Van Sickle (“ward”); a December 15, 2003, order dismissing an application for an order to show cause why a residential decision made for the ward by the guardian, Guardian and Protective Services, Inc. (“GPS”), should not be set aside and why GPS should not be removed as guardian; and a July 8, 2004, order denying David’s motion for a new trial. The Protection & Advocacy Project (“P & A”) also appealed from the December 15, 2003, and July 8, 2004, orders of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. American National Watermattress Corp. v. ManvilleAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Helbling v. HelblingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Public Service Commission v. Wimbledon Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hefty v. AldrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. O'Neill v. O'NeillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Nodak Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lawrence v. DelkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Interest of B.A.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. The People of the State of South Dakota in the Interest of O.S.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Aurora Medical Park, LLC v. Kidney & Hypertension Center, PLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API