Trantor v. Fredrikson
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTONE, Justice.
In State v. Richey, 160 Ariz. 564, 774 P.2d 1354 (1989), we held that a trial court must make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law in awarding attorneys’ fees under A.R.S. § 12-341.01(0) and § 12-349. The question- we answer today is whether the failure of a party to object to the absence of these findings prevents that party from raising the issue on appeal. We hold that it does.
I. BACKGROUND
Trantor fell through a ceiling at work and was injured. The Fredriksons owned the building. Trantor brought an action against the Fredriksons alleging that an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. RicheyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Johnson v. ElliottArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- United States (Treasury Dept., IRS) v. Globe Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Bayless Investment & Trading Co. v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- State v. Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Myrick v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.