Legal Opinion

Trantor v. Fredrikson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1994No. CV-93-0124-PRPublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

In State v. Richey, 160 Ariz. 564, 774 P.2d 1354 (1989), we held that a trial court must make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law in awarding attorneys’ fees under A.R.S. § 12-341.01(0) and § 12-349. The question- we answer today is whether the failure of a party to object to the absence of these findings prevents that party from raising the issue on appeal. We hold that it does.

I. BACKGROUND

Trantor fell through a ceiling at work and was injured. The Fredriksons owned the building. Trantor brought an action against the Fredriksons alleging that an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. RicheyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Johnson v. ElliottArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. United States (Treasury Dept., IRS) v. Globe Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Bayless Investment & Trading Co. v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Shawanee S. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. State v. Moreno-MedranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Wang Electric, Inc. v. Smoke Tree Resort, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Myrick v. MaloneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API