Legal Opinion

Markowitz v. Arizona Parks Board

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1985No. 18033-PRPublishedCited by 205 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

Ruth Markowitz (plaintiff) brought this action on behalf of her son, David Lee Markowitz (David) to recover for injuries sustained by David as a result of a dive into Lake Havasu. Lake Havasu Recreation Area is owned by the United States government and leased by it to the state of Arizona. Plaintiff also named Joseph T. Falline, Commissioner of the Arizona Land Department, and Michael A. Ramnes, Director of the Arizona Park Board, as defendants. These claims were dismissed by the trial court. The state, the only defendant remaining, moved for summary judgment, primarily…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Coburn v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Wisener v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Beach v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by205 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gipson v. KaseyArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Robertson v. Sixpence Inns of America, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990

200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API