Legal Opinion
Larsen v. Decker
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 22, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 99-0414PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOCI, Judge.
111 Karen H. Larsen appeals from the judgment awarding her damages resulting from an automobile accident and from the trial court’s denial of her motion for new trial. She contends that the court erred in excluding some of her medical records and bills and a Social Security Administration (“SSA”) report finding her permanently disabled after the auto accident. Specifically, she argues that Rule 803(8)(C), Arizona Rules of Evidence (“the Rule”), does not distinguish between factual findings and conclusions for purposes of the admissibility of a public agency report. Although…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Rosemary J. Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corporation, and Daniel P. Batchelor, Rosemary J. Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corporation Daniel P. BatchelorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- E.J. Wilson, Dearest Davis, and Cassandra Linder, Plaintiffs v. Roland AttawayCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Gorostieta v. ParkinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Higgins v. Assmann Electronics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. McCurdyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Shotwell v. DonahoeArizona Supreme Court · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.